Matt Taibbi rips Fareed Zakaria

I have always felt a strong, inexplicable pull towards liking and agreeing with Fareed Zakaria, without knowing why.

I remember telling a friend of mine about a year ago that I really like his articles, but that I wished sometimes he would just drop the proper, status quo act and just really tell it like it is for once.

taibbi

Thanks to the greatest political blogger in the world, Matt Taibbi, I no longer feel that strange desire to nod my head at everything Zakaria says or writes. In his latest post, Taibbi rips Zakaria’s Newsweek piece defending capitalism into a million tiny pieces, and unlike the Fry book, it is chocked-full of unalderated truth:

Any writer who doesn’t admire what this guy does is probably not being honest with himself, because being the public face of conventional wisdom is an extremely difficult job — and as a man of letters Zakaria routinely succeeds, or pseudo-succeeds, at the most seemingly impossible literary tasks, making the sensational seem dull and the outrageous commonplace, rendering horrifying absolutes ambiguous and full of gray areas.

(In his original piece, he misspelled ambiguous. But it’s cool because I misspell things like that all the time.)

Suddenly it all makes sense. I found myself feeling the need to agree with Fareed Zakaria because he represents common sense; ie conventional wisdom. The problem with conventional wisdom is that it is right 99.9 percent of the time, but when it’s wrong, the consequences are disastrous. Example: the western mainstream media’s pitiful, even to this day, explanations for the roots and causes of Islamic terrorism.

I have expressed my displeasure with the general mediocrity in Newsweek’s reporting before, but seeing Zakaria in this new light puts the very integrity of the publication into question as far as I’m concerned.

Ok, Jonathan Alter is not and never has embodied anything close to the cavalier journalistic spirit of E.R Murrow, but I always held a certain degree of respect for Newsweek until very recently. Perhaps it has something to do with my upbringing. Newsweek was the magazine of record in my house growing up, so it’s afforded a special status in my subconscious, but now I find it hard to believe that I was blinded to their mainstream B.S. for so long.

There are many many drawbacks to the development of new media and the gradual decay and death of traditional newspapers and magazines. Yes, it’s cool that Twitter is available to the Iranians, but it’s also shown how unreliable it is by crashing every 8 hours.

Yes, blogs have promoted decentralization and democratization as far as how people get and perceive their news, but there’s also no fact-checker working behind the scenes, nobody to call an anonymous blogger out when they publish grade-A, irresponsible nonsense. (You shut up.  Just shut up. We’ll discuss my nonsense another day.)

Yes, there are a lot of problems with the current trends in media. But my heart swells with joy when I envision a day when nobody has to pretend to like a journalist just because he represents conventional wisdom.

One Response to “Matt Taibbi rips Fareed Zakaria”

  1. Sedate Me Says:

    Twitter and all the twits on it can go fuck themselves. (Oh, was that more than 140 characters? Wouldn’t want to bore anybody with the attention span of a gnats on speed.)

    The only excuse for paying attention to the New Media is that the Traditional Media has gone to shit. It’s gotten so bad, they now actually read e-mail and “tweets” from twats on air like they’re important. Don’t these fucktard “journalists” realize that doing this only accelerates their trip to the unemployment line? Morons!

    I’d much rather see some more wisdom injected into the conventional wisdom than have it pushed aside by some hyper decentralized, fact free, echo chamber of real-time, circle jerkers. Information anarchy is no way to run a country.

    In order for democracy to work, even just a little bit, you need as many quality, trustworthy, and preferably unbiased, sources of information possible. Otherwise, to paraphrase Plato’s critique of democracy, the loudest, most persuasive, PR savvy assholes will lead a imbecilic public into ruin for their own selfish gain. Sound familiar?

Leave a Reply